A chamber application seeking restoration of a previous writ petition was disposed of. The single judge recalled the prior order and granted restoration of the writ petition to the file, allowing the chamber application.
Recall of order dated 22.02.2016 and restoration of W.P.(C) No. 2529 of 2002 to its file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMAPL No. 149 of 2016
12.04.2016 This CMAPL has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 2529 of 2002.
Heard Mr. N.C. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. P.K. Muduli, learned A
ddl. Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. A. Routray, learned counsel for opposite party no.
3.
Considering grounds stated in the petition and after hearing learned counsel for the
parties, the order dated 22.02.2016 is hereby recalled and W.P.(C) No. 2529 of 2002 is restore
d to its file.
Accordingly, the CMAPL is allowed.
Ashok
Dr. B.R. Sarangi,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of W.P.(C) No. 2529 of 2002 should be allowed.
Petitioner
State
Opposite party no.3
Ashok
Dr. B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court