Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate.
The petitioners have been summoned to answer charges under Sections 341, 294,
323, 354, 379 and 506/34 of the IPC in C.T. Case No.767 of 2011 of the court of learned J.M.F.
C., Soro, arising out of Soro P.S. Case No.388 of 2011. Application for anticipatory bail is n
ot maintainable as summon has already been issued. The learned counsel for the petitioners sub
mits that the offences involved are non-bailable, hence, there is chance of the petitioners be
ing remanded to custody on their appearance. The apprehension is not well founded. This Court
trusts and believes that since the learned J.M.F.C., Soro issued summons to the accused person
s at the first instance. On the event they shall surrender before the learned J.M.F.C., Soro i
n the aforesaid case within twenty-one days, if so advised, the learned Magistrate shall pass
appropriate order.