Disposed
Jogindra Rana@Jugindra Rana v. State of Orissa
Orissa HCABLAPL/3655/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.3655 of 2016 02. 19.04.2016 Heard learned…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ABLAPL No.3655 of 2016
02. 19.04.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel f
or the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other co-accus
ed persons similarly situated have already been released on bail in the meantime.
On consideration of the nature of allegations made against the
petitioner, it is directed that in the event the petitioner surrenders before the learned J.M
.F.C., Kantamal, in C.T. Case No.156 of 2015, arising out of Kantamal P.S. Case No.68 of 2015,
and moves for bail, the same shall be disposed of in the first hour so as to enable him to mo
ve the higher forum on the same day in the event of rejection. Case Diary be made available. R
ecords, if necessary, be transmitted at the cost of the petitioner.
It is needless to say that learned Court below, while consider
ing the bail application of the petitioner, shall see whether he stands on the similar footing
as the other co-accused persons, who have been released on bail and pass necessary orders in
accordance with law.
The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
S.C. Parija, J.
uks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the petitioner should be disposed of on priority given the release of co-accused.
Petitioner
State
S.C. Parija
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court