Seatrans Shipmanagem v. Union of India and or
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call on 18.11.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C ) No.4843 of 2014
18.11.2015 The defects have not been removed inspite of peremptorily order.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call.
Mrs. M. Padhi, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Customs & Service Tax Departmen
t is present.
Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
I. Mahanty, J. Dr.D.P. Choudhury, J.
3
Petitioner
Customs & Service Tax Department
Mahanty, I.
Choudhury, Dr. D. P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court