Dismissed
State v. Kamala Store
Orissa HCSTREV/278/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Full Bench dismissed Special Transitional Review Application No.278 of 2008 as time barred, finding the 1710-day delay impermissible and unsatisfied with the petitioner's explanation.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
STREV No.278 of 2008
03. 18.11.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the questi
on of limitation.
¶2
There is delay of 1710 days in filing the revision.
We are not satisfied with the explanation given for condoning the delay. Accor
dingly, the STREV is dismissed on the question of limitation.
¶3
I. Mahanty,J.
¶4
Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J.
¶5
2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the delay in filing the special transitional review application exceeds the allowable period and justifies condonation based on the explanation provided.
Coram
AI extract
I. Mahanty
Dr.D.P.Choudhury
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court