Subject to the query, the Special Leave Petitioner failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for a delay of 2,292 days in filing. The petition was dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
STREV No.286 of 2008
03. 18.11.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on the questi
on of limitation.
There is delay of 2292 days in filing the revision.
We are not satisfied with the explanation given for condoning the delay. Accor
dingly, the STREV is dismissed on the question of limitation.
I. Mahanty,J.
Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J.
2
I. Mahanty
D.P. Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court