In a writ petition, the High Court disposed of frivolous proceedings by issuing a direction to the Thasildar of Tirtol to adjudicate the demarcation case within six months.
Direction to discharge the Thasildar, Tirtol, to dispose of Demarcation Case Memo No.1830 (2) dated 25.5.2015 within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.18920 of 2015
02.11.2015
The petitioner in this petition has prayed for a direction to the Thasildar, T
irtol-opposite party to dispose of Demarcation Case vide Memo No.1830 (2) dated 25.5.2015 with
in a stipulated period.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to t
he said opposite party to dispose of the aforesaid demarcation case within a stipulated period
Considering the innocuous prayer, this petition is disposed of with a directio
n to the Thasildar, Tirtol-opposite party to dispose of Demarcation Case vide Memo No.1830 (2)
dated 25.5.2015 within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy o
f this order.
Free copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the State.
Dr.A.K.Rath, J.1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction to dispose of a demarcation case within a stipulated time under Article 226 is maintainable.
Petitioner
Thasildar, Tirtol
Dr.A.K.Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court