Dismissed
Biswajeet Bhuyan v. Cesco.
Orissa HCWP(C)/1528/2003
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating they had no instructions, resulting in non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
W.P.(C) No. 1528 of 2003
¶2
02.12.2015
¶3
Mr. B. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a memo submits that he has n
o instruction in the matter. Memo be kept on record.
¶4
Mr. B.K. Pattnaik, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 1 & 2 is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶5
1
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Opposite Party nos. 1 & 2
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court