Bhagirathi Parida v. Chairman-Cum-M.D.Uco
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought direction to promote him to Scale-II from 1988 onwards under the 1987 Promotion Policy and split vacancies. The court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner was promoted under the 1992 Policy, had superannuated, and thus the speculative claim based on the 1987 Policy was misconceived and unsustainable in law.
What did the court decide?
Relief sought for by the petitioner dismissed as the claim to promotion under 1987 Promotion Policy cannot sustain in the eye of law.