While noting a typographical error in an office note, the court dismissed the writ petition as voluntarily withdrawn and vacated the interim order.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order dated 02.07.2015 vacated. Office directed to communicate the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(C) No.11230 of 2015
04. 20.11.2015 Office note indicates that in the 5th line of Order No
.3 dated 2.7.2015, it has been inadvertently mentioned as Writ Petition in place of Misc. Case
.
This being the typographical error, necessary correction be made accor
dingly.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present writ
application and to that effect a memo has been filed.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Interim
order dated 02.07.2015 stands vacated. Office to communicate this order.
I.Mahanty,
J.
Dr.D.P.Choudhury, J.
Misc. Case No.15957 of 2015
2
I. Mahanty
Dr. D.P. Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court