Tapan Ku.Patnaik v. State of Orissavig.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged the issuance of summons in a corruption case involving offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Section 409. The court held that since the petitioner had not been arrested, there was no apprehension of arrest, making the application for anticipatory bail non-maintainable and dismissible.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed as non-maintainable due to lack of apprehension of arrest.