Disposed

Madhu Sudan Palai S/O Late Binayak Palai Aged About 51 Years v. 1. State of Odisha Represented by Chief Secretary Government of Odisha

NGT18 Aug 2026IA No. 51/2026 in Original Application No. 32/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal disposed of two interim applications regarding non-joinder of parties. It allowed the application to implead respondents moved for in a second application, directing the applicant to implead necessary parties and issue notices.

What did the court decide?

Allowance of application to implead respondents moved in the second interim application; direction to applicant to implead necessary parties within a week and issue notices.

Madhu Sudan Palai S/O Late Binayak Palai Aged About 51… — Writ and Judicial Review | NGT (2026)

¶1

Item No.09

¶2

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA

¶3

(THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING WITH HYBRID MODE)

¶4

Original Application No.32/2026/EZ (I.A. No.27/2026/EZ, I.A. No.51/2026/EZ & I.A. No.68/2026/EZ)

¶5

Madhusudan Palai & Others Applicants

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Odisha & Ors.

¶8

Respondents

¶9

Date of hearing: 18.08.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEO KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER HON’BLE MR. ISHWAR SINGH, EXPERT MEMBER

¶10

Applicants: Mr. Sankar Prasad Pani and Mr. Ashutosh Padhy, Advocates for the applicants (through VC).

¶11

Respondents:Mr. Utkarsh Chandra and Mr. Aryan Rachh, Advocates for respondents no.1 to 5, 9 (through VC).

¶12

Ms. Papiya Banerjee Bihani, Advocate for respondent no.6 (through VC).

¶13

Ms. Rashhmi Singhee, Advocate for respondent no.7 (through VC). Mr. Sourav Haldar, Advocate for respondent no.8 (through VC). Mr. Biranchi Narayan Mahapatra, Advocate for respondents no.11 to 16 (through VC). None for respondent no.10.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Learned counsel for respondents no.7, 1, 2 and 5 has filed the reply.

¶16

Learned counsel for the respondents has pressed the I.A. No.51/2026/EZ while learned counsel for the applicant has pressed the I.A. No.68/2026/EZ.

¶17

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

The first application (I.A. No.51/2026/EZ), the issue was raised with regard to non-joinder of necessary parties and the notices and copies of the same are provided to the learned counsel for the applicant and in response to the above, in accordance with report of the State PCB, I.A. No.68/2026/EZ was moved for impleading the proper and necessary

¶19

parties.

¶20

¶21

Learned counsel for the respondents has pressed first I.A. i.e. I.A. No.51/2026/EZ and submission of the opposite parties are that in presence of I.A. No.68/2026/EZ the deficiency which was raised by the I.A. No.51/2026/EZ has been substantially modified and necessary parties who were raised by first I.A. No.51/2026/EZ have been rectified by impleading the necessary and proper parties by moving I.A. No.68/2026/EZ.

¶22

Accordingly, the respondents in I.A. No.68/2026/EZ are proper and necessary parties and thus, the application is allowed to implead those respondents.

¶23

Both the I.As. are disposed of accordingly.

¶24

However, the learned counsel moving the I.A. No.51/2026/EZ has the opportunity to raise further objection in light of the above order and move an application with regard to other non-joinder of parties or necessary parties who were left out.

¶25

List the matter on 27.10.2026 for further proceedings.

¶26

The applicant is directed to take steps for impleading the necessary parties within a week and further issue notice with the relevant documents to the proposed newly impleaded respondents with a direction to submit the reply before the date of listing.

¶27

Sheo Kumar Singh, JM

¶28

Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM

¶29

Ishwar Singh, EM

¶30

August 18^th , 2026 Original Application No.32/2026/EZ (I.A. No.27/2026/EZ, I.A. No.51/2026/EZ & I.A. No.68/2026/EZ) MN

¶31

Madhu Sudan Palai S/O Late Binayak Palai Aged About 51 Years v. 1. State of Odisha Represented by Chief Secretary Government of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Sudan Palai S/O Late Binayak Palai Aged About 51 Years v. 1. State of Odisha Represented by Chief Secretary Government of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Nadavala vs Ministry of Environment Forests Climate Change

Rajiv Bhagelu Gupta vs District Collector Palghar

Satam Patnaik vs State of Odisha

Ia No. 814/2025 in Misc Application in disposed of cases No. 130/2025 of Vedanta Limited vs State of Tamilnadu

1. Dillip Kumar Pradhan S/O Khira Mohan Pradhan Aged About 64 Years vs 1. State of Odisha Represented by Additional Chief Secretary

Saravanan vs Union of India Rep. by Its Secretary to Government Ministry of Environment & Forests & Climate Change

Ram Gayen vs State of West Bengal

Ram Gayen vs State of West Bengal

Madhu Sudan Palai S/O Late Binayak Palai Aged About 51 Years vs 1. State of Odisha Represented by Chief Secretary Government of Odisha

Subhas Datta vs State of West Bengal Notice through the Chief Secretary

Ram Gayen vs State of West Bengal