The National Green Tribunal dismissed multiple miscellaneous applications and interlocutory applications for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item Nos. 26 to 28
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
M.A. No. 124/2023 In Original Application No. 692/2022 (IA No 295/2024) WITH IA No. 851/2023 In Original Application No. 692/2022 WITH M.A. No. 123/2023 In Original Application No. 442/2022
Junaid Ayubi Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 15.04.2025
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER Applicant: Mr. Ajit Sharma & Mr. Kanchan Kumar Singh, Advs. for Original Applicant ` Respondents: Ms. Anjali Rajput, Adv. for the State of Uttarakhand Dr. Aman Rab & Mrs. Payal Bhatia Mohanty, Adv. for SEIAA, Uttarakhand (Through VC) Mr. Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava, Adv. for the State of Himachal Pradesh (Through VC) Mr. Mukesh Verma & Ms. Vatsala Tripathi, Advs. for UKPCB (Through VC)
ORDER
851/2023 & M.A. No. 123/2023. On the previous date also, on
1
03.04.2025, no one was present for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting these matters. Hence, MA No. 124/2023, I.A. No. 851/2023 & M.A. No. 123/2023 are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
April 15, 2025 M.A. No. 124/2023 & other connected matters JG..
2
Junaid Ayubi
State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
Sudhir Agarwal
A. Senthil Vel
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application before a tribunal, including applications in already disposed of matters.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
