Application dismissed for want of prosecution as applicants were absent on the date of hearing and previously, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item Nos. 26 to 28
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
M.A. No. 124/2023 In Original Application No. 692/2022 (IA No 295/2024) WITH IA No. 851/2023 In Original Application No. 692/2022 WITH M.A. No. 123/2023 In Original Application No. 442/2022
Junaid Ayubi Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 15.04.2025
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER Applicant: Mr. Ajit Sharma & Mr. Kanchan Kumar Singh, Advs. for Original Applicant ` Respondents: Ms. Anjali Rajput, Adv. for the State of Uttarakhand Dr. Aman Rab & Mrs. Payal Bhatia Mohanty, Adv. for SEIAA, Uttarakhand (Through VC) Mr. Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava, Adv. for the State of Himachal Pradesh (Through VC) Mr. Mukesh Verma & Ms. Vatsala Tripathi, Advs. for UKPCB (Through VC)
ORDER
851/2023 & M.A. No. 123/2023. On the previous date also, on
1
03.04.2025, no one was present for the applicant. It appears that the applicants are not interested in prosecuting these matters. Hence, MA No. 124/2023, I.A. No. 851/2023 & M.A. No. 123/2023 are dismissed for want of prosecution.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
April 15, 2025 M.A. No. 124/2023 & other connected matters JG..
2
Junaid Ayubi
State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
Sudhir Agarwal
A. Senthil Vel
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An application for interim relief made while the main matter is pending.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
