Appeals were dismissed as not pressed by the appellant after depositing the required amount, albeit with liberty to approach the respondent for withdrawal of coercive action.
Appeals dismissed as not pressed with liberty to seek withdrawal of coercive action. (No specific application filed yet)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item Nos. 01 to 03 Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Appeal No. 40/2025
(IA No. 403/2025, IA No. 402/2025, IA No. 401/2025)
Nakul Kumar Gupta Appellant Versus Uttarakhand Forest Department Respondent
With
Appeal No. 41/2025 (IA No. 404/2025, IA No. 406/2025, IA No. 405/2025)
Nakul Kumar Gupta Appellant Versus Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board Respondent
With
Appeal No. 42/2025
(IA No. 409/2025, IA No. 407/2025, IA No. 408/2025)
Nakul Kumar Gupta Appellant Versus
Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board Respondent
Date of hearing: 10.07.2025
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Appellant: Mr. Siddharth Arora & Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advs. for Appellant
ORDER
1
liberty as prayed.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
July 10, 2025 Appeal 40/2025 and connected matters AS
2
Nakul Kumar Gupta
Uttarakhand Forest Department
Uttarakhand Pollution Control Board
Prakash Shrivastava
A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal before a tribunal against an order of a statutory authority.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
