S Madhu v. Seiaa Tamilnadu
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant withdrew Appeal No.26 of 2025 before the National Green Tribunal Southern Zone. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the basis of the withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.02:-
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI
Wednesday, the 09th day of July, 2025.
[Through Physical Hearing (Hybrid Option)]
Appeal No.26 of 2025 (SZ)
IN THE MATTER OF:
S. Madhu S/o. Srinivasan, D.No.12, Eden Garden, Thally Road, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu – 635 109.
...Appellant (s)
Versus
State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority – Tamil Nadu Through the Member Secretary, 9th Floor, Metro (CMRL Building), Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.
...Respondent(s)
For Appellant (s): Mr. G. Vignesh. For Respondent(s): Ms. Aarti represented Mr. S. Sai Sathya Jith.
CORAM :
HON’BLE Smt. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON’BLE Dr. SATYAGOPAL KORLAPATI, EXPERT MEMBER
Page 1 of 2
O R D E R
1. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, Mr. G. Vignesh, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, submitted that the appellant wants to withdraw the appeal and accordingly, made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the endorsement made, the appeal
[Appeal No.26 of 2025 (SZ)] is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Smt. Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana, JM
Sd/Dr. Satyagopal Korlapati, EM Appeal No.26/2025 (SZ) 09th July, 2025. Mn.
Page 2 of 2
S. Madhu
State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority – Tamil Nadu
Pushpa Sathyanarayana
Satyagopal Korlapati
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal before a tribunal against an order of a statutory authority.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court