NGT New Delhi dismissed a review application filed by the Union of India seeking to challenge an order imposing a reduced penal cost, finding no error apparent on the face of the order.
The review application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 17
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
R.A. No. 6/2024 In Original Application No. 203/2023 (IA No. 154/2024) Tushar Goswami Applicant Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondent(s) --------------
Union of India, through The Secretary, MoEF&CC Review Applicant
Date of hearing: 08.08.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Review Applicant: Mr. Vikram Banerjee, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Pratap, Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Ms. Tanisha Samanta, Mr. Prashant Rawat & Ms. Rashi Mangal, Advs. for Review Applicant in R.A. No. 06/2024
ORDER
river side of Ganga at Varanasi for commercial purposes.
1
2
The order dated 06.02.2024 does not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the order. None of the conditions prescribed in Order 47 Rule 1 of the CPC for review is satisfied in the matter.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
August 08, 2024 R.A. No. 6/2024 In OA No. 203/2023 (IA No. 154/2024) DV
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order reducing penal cost satisfies the conditions for exercise of review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Tushar Goswami
Union of India
Prakash Shrivastava
Sudhir Agarwal
A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An application asking a tribunal to review its own order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
