In a review application, the National Green Tribunal dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear or argue before the bench despite prior adjournments and liberty granted.
Review application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No. 13
Court No. 1
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Review Application No. 35/2023 In Original Application No. 189/2019
Sarvan Kumar Applicant
Versus
State of Telangana Respondent ---------M/s Shri Kartikeya Pharma Units-II Review Applicant
Date of hearing: 10.09.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Review Applicant: None Appears Respondent: Mr. Dhananjay Baijal, Adv. for Telangana SPCB
ORDER
1
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
September 10, 2024
Review Application No. 35/2023 In Original Application No. 189/2019 dv..
2
Sarvan Kumar
State of Telangana
Prakash Shrivastava
Sudhir Agarwal
A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An application asking a tribunal to review its own order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
