National Green Tribunal disposed of an original application lodged via letter petition. The Tribunal found the complaint regarding illegal mining in Himachal Pradesh to be too vague. Consequently, it ruled that a suit case to exercise suo motu jurisdiction was not justified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.02
Court No. 2
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No.760/2024
Pyar Singh Nishad Applicant
Versus
State of U.P. Respondent
Date of hearing: 06.08.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant(s): None
ORDER
1
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
August 06, 2024 Original Application No.760/2024 M
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the vested original application regarding alleged illegal mining qualifies as a fit case for the Tribunal to exercise suo motu jurisdiction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pyar Singh Nishad
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
