Original application challenging the operation of a brick kiln in violation of site criteria rules. The Tribunal found no material evidence on record of a violation of the 2022 Rules and dismissed the plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. 1
Item No. 04
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 500/2024
Monu Kumar
Applicant
Versus
MoEF&CC & Ors.
Respondent(s)
Date of hearing: 06.05.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON HON’BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Mr. Raunak Parekh, Adv. for Applicant (Through VC)
ORDER
any material that 2022 Rules have been violated or the minimum
1
distance prescribed in the Rules, 2022 does not exist in respect of Respondent No. 6.
Prakash Shrivastava, CP
Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
May 06, 2024 Original Application No. 500/2024 DV
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the operation of a brick kiln violated the Environment Protection Amendment Rules, 2022.
Whether the Consent to Establish was issued under applicable rules.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Monu Kumar
MoEF&CC & Ors.
Prakash Shrivastava
A. Senthil Vel
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
