Applicant complaint regarding smoke emission from sweetmeat shop oven dismissed for lack of material evidence admission.
Original Application No. 212/2024 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.06
Court No. 2
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 212/2024
Dharmender Kumar
Applicant
Versus
State of Haryana Respondent
Date of hearing: 03.07.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Applicant in person (through VC) Respondent: None
ORDER
1
“(k) industrial plant” means any plant used for any industrial or trade purposes and emitting any air pollutant into the atmosphere;”
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM
July 03, 2024 Original Application No. 212/2024 AB
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an oven installed in a sweetmeat shop qualifies as an industrial plant under the Air Act, 1981.
Whether the bare allegation of air pollution is supported by material leading to interference.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharmender Kumar
State of Haryana
Sudhir Agarwal
Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
