Applicant sought suuo-moto jurisdiction on a letter petition. Application was withdrawn with liberty to file a proper application. The Tribunal dismissed the application.
The application is dismissed with liberty to file a proper application in accordance with rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.07
Court No. 2
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Original Application No. 401/2024
Sanjeev Kumar Pansari
Applicant
Versus
State of Bihar Respondent
Date of hearing: 02.07.2024
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR AGARWAL JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE DR. AFROZ AHMAD, EXPERT MEMBER
Applicant: Ms. Akrity Aishwarya, Advocate for Applicant (through VC)
ORDER
1
Sudhir Agarwal, JM
Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM July 02, 2024 Original Application No. 401/2024 M
2
Sanjeev Kumar Pansari
State of Bihar
Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Afroz Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
An original application before a tribunal, most commonly a service dispute before the Central or a State Administrative Tribunal.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
