The Tribunal disposed of an application seeking condonation of 15 days delay in re-filing an insolvency appeal. The court found the reasons submitted sufficient for condonation and listed the case for admission.
Delay of 15 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is condoned. Case listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI
Interlocutory Application No.6216/2026 Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.___/2026 (F.No.05.08.2026/NCLAT/UR/07957)
In the matter of:
Alka Ramanlal Gandhi
…. Appellant
Vs.
Atul Tansukhlal Mehta
…. Respondents
Appearance: None appeared for the appellant
03rd September, 2026 (Hybrid Mode)
This is an application to extend the time granted for curing the defects.
The facts of the case are that the Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 22.07.2026. The Office after scrutiny of the Memo of Appeal on 05.08.2026, intimated the defects to the Appellant on the same day. The Appellant re-filed the Appeal on 27.08.2026.
None appeared on behalf of the Appellant. Perused the averments made in the IA as well as Office report.
Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 15 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.
As prayed, list the case before the Hon’ble Bench under the heading ‘for admission (fresh case)’.
With the aforesaid order, this IA stands disposed of.
(Raj Kumar) Registrar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 15 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.
Alka Ramanlal Gandhi
Atul Tansukhlal Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
An application for interim relief made while the main matter is pending.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
