This writ petition was dismissed by the High Court of Manipur under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution, where counsel for the petitioners failed to appear despite previous notices.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by LAISHRAM LAISHRAM DHAKESHORI DEVI DHAKESHORI DEVI Date: 2022.09.14 15:02:31 +05'30'
Item No. 58
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 747 of 2019 Urikhinbam Narjit Singh & anr. …Petitioner/s
Vs.
State of Manipur & 2 ors. …Respondent/s
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
14-09-2022
When the matter is called up, none appeared for the
petitioners.
Mr. A. Vashum, learned GA and Ms. L. Sillori, learned
counsel appeared on behalf of the respondents.
On the last several occasions, learned counsel for the petitioners was absent, accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
JUDGE
Dhakeshori
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be maintained in the absence of the petitioner.
Urikhinbam Narjit Singh
State of Manipur
Ahantthem Bimol Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
