State of Manipur and 3 Ors. v. Seltun Roben and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
2 (Through Video Conferencing) IN THE HIGH…
2 (Through Video Conferencing) IN THE HIGH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed KABORAMBA by KABORAMBAM M SANDEEP SANDEEP SINGH Date: 2021.11.25 SINGH 15:06:44 +05'30'
Item No. 1, 2 (Through Video Conferencing)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
PIL NO. 48 OF 2021 WITH MC(PIL) NO. 21 OF 2021
Seltun Roben and another
... Petitioners
-Versus-
The State of Manipur and others
... Respondents
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJAY KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN
25.11.2021. (Sanjay Kumar, CJ)
Mr. I. Lalitkumar, learned senior counsel, appearing for the
petitioners, states that the issue has been addressed during the pendency of
this case and that adjudication on merits is no longer required in this writ petition filed in public interest.
PIL No. 48 of 2021 is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
In consequence, MC(PIL) No. 21 of 2021 filed by the State,
raising the issue of maintainability of the case, is also dismissed.
No order as to costs.
A copy of this order shall be supplied online or through
whatsapp to the learned counsel.
JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
bidya
Seltun Roben
The State of Manipur
Sanjay Kumar
MV Muralidaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court