Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon representation by counsel for both parties that the matter is infructuous and may be closed without further ado.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item No.14
JOHN TELE N KOM
Digitally signed by JOHN IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR TELEN KOM AT IMPHAL Date: 2021.11.29 11:17:39 WP(C) No.364 of 2018 +05'30'
(Through video conference)
Lani Panmei, aged about 50 years, s/o Ningthougong Panmei, R/o Model Village, Ward No.III, PO & PS Tamenglong, Tamenglong District, Manipur
& 27 Ors.
…. Petitioners
State of Manipur, represented by the Commissioner (CAF & PD), Government of Manipur & 2 Ors.
.... Respondents
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN
24.11.2021
[1] Heard Mr.D. Julius Riamei, learned counsel for the
petitioner and Ms. Monomala, learned GA for the State respondent.
[2] Mr.D. Julius Riamei, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the matter has become infractuous and therefore, the matter may be closed. Ms. Monomala, learned GA also agreed for the same.
[3] Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
JUDGE
John Kom
Lani Panmei & 27 Ors.
State of Manipur & 2 Ors.
MV Muralidaran
John Kom
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
