Rajeshwari v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court, W.P.Crl.No.1550 of 2025, decided 14.07.2026 by G.K. Ilanthiraiyan, J. Petitioner A.Rajeshwari (counsel P. Vijendran) sought mandamus under Article 226 against the District Collector, Superintendent of Police and Inspector of Police, Salem, to act on her representation dated 05.11.2025 regarding residence arrangements at Velliyampatti Village, Salem. Respondents represented by R. Ganesh Kumar, Government Counsel (Criminal Side). Petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission; no costs. Keywords: writ petition dismissed as infructuous, mandamus, Article 226, representation, Salem, no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous, the learned counsel for the petitioner having submitted that the prayer in the writ petition had become infructuous. ¶26