Dismissed¶21

S.Thiruvaranga Thamuthanar v. the Chief Engineer/Personnel

Madras HC14 Jul 2026WP/7671/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 7671 of 2014; Madras High Court; decided 14-07-2026; Justice T. Vinod Kumar; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of mandamus; appointment; I.T.I. Helper (Trainee); TANGEDCO (Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.); Chief Engineer/Personnel; Superintending Engineer Villupuram E.D. Circle; direct recruitment 2013-14; interview held 13.11.2013; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs. ¶21

S.Thiruvaranga Thamuthanar Vs the Chief… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 7671 of 2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14-07-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶6

WP No. 7671 of 2014

¶7

S.Thiruvaranga Thamuthanar S/o.M.Swaminatha Pillai, Poothamedu, Ayyur Agaram Post, Villupuram Taluk And District

¶8

..Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Chief Engineer/Personnel Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Anna Salai, Chennai-2.

¶11

The Superintending Engineer Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., (TANGEDCO), Villupuram E.D.Circle, Villupuram 605 602.

¶12

..Respondents

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying

¶14

to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner for the post of I.T.I. Helper (Trainee) under a direct recruitment 2013-14 based on the interview held on 13.11.2013 by the respondents.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Shyam Sundar, for Mr. M. Vinoth For Respondents : Mr. R. Nikkhilesh Athav, for Mr. K. Rajkumar, Senior Counsel

¶16

Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 7671 of 2014

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration any further and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. An endorsement has also been made on the bundle to that effect.

¶21

2 . In view of the aforesaid submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶22

14-07-2026

¶23

klt

¶24

__________ Page2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

WP No. 7671 of 2014

¶27

¶28