Dismissed¶¶24

Shanmugavadivu v. the District Collector

Madras HC15 Jul 2026WP/30598/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court withdrawal order; Shanmugavadivu v. District Collector Erode District and others; W.P.No.30598 of 2025; W.M.P.Nos.34288 & 34290 of 2025; Article 226 certiorari against Block Development Officer Pichandapalayam Panchayat notice regarding park; dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; Hemant Chandangoudar J.; decided 15.07.2026; not citable on merits.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel's endorsement, connected W.M.P.Nos.34288 & 34290 of 2025 closed, no order as to costs. ¶¶24

Shanmugavadivu Vs the District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.30598 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 15.07.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶6

W.P.No.30598 of 2025 and

¶7

W.M.P.Nos.34288 & 34290 of 2025

¶8

Shanmugavadivu W/o.Sudhakar ... Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

The District Collector Collectorate Erode District.

¶11

The Block Development Officer Pichandapalayam Panchayat Erode Taluk & District.

¶12

Duraisamy S/o.Kumarasamy Gounder

¶13

Dhanalakshmi W/o.Shanmugam

¶14

Kiruthika W/o.Logesh Kumar … Respondents

¶15

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned

¶16

Page Nos. 1 / 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.30598 of 2025

¶19

order of notice of the 2^nd respondent dated Nil which was placed in the notice board in front of the park on 06.08.2025 and to quash the same.

¶20

For Petitioner : Ms.K.Dhadupriya for Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Sivavarthanan Government Counsel, for R1 Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam, for R2 Mr.V.Vijay Shankar, for R3 to R5 *********

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Ms.K.Dhadupriya, learned counsel representing the counsel on record

¶23

for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶24

In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶25

15.07.2026

¶26

Speaking / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes / No Index : Yes / No

¶27

¶28

Page Nos. 2 / 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.30598 of 2025

¶31