G.P.Kalaichelvi v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Impleadment application; Writ Miscellaneous Petition (W.M.P.) in pending writ petition; Article 226 Constitution of India; addition of respondents Nos. 5 and 6; revenue authorities — Revenue Divisional Officer Guindy and Tahsildar Guindy; Kancheepuram District Collector; RDO Tambaram; Tahsildar Alandur Taluk; Special Commissioner and Director of Survey and Settlement; Government Advocate consent/no objection; Registry amendment direction; Madras High Court; W.P.No.45275 of 2025; petitioner G.P.Kalaichelvi; advocates K.V.Sajeevkumar and C.Jayaprakash.
What did the court decide?
Impleadment of the proposed respondents (the Revenue Divisional Officer, Guindy, Chennai, and the Tahsildar, Guindy, Chennai) as respondents Nos. 5 and 6 in W.P.No.45275 of 2025 permitted; Registry directed to carry out the necessary amendment. ¶27