petitioner company as well as Mr.G.Venkatesan, who is the F-card holder must strictly adhere by the CBLR, 2018. In fact, before this Court, the petitioner has given an undertaking through his counsel that paragraph Nos.1 to 5 of the impugned communication will be strictly adhered to by the petitioner, as the petitioner is aggrieved only by one restriction namely paragraph No.6 imposed by the first respondent under the impugned communication with regard to Mr.G.Venkatesh (F-card holder) from representing the interest of the petitioner before the Customs department at Chennai for the purpose of obtaining customs brokering license for the petitioner at Chennai. Except for this grievance, the petitioner has no other grievance with regard to the impugned communication dated 17.10.2025 issued by the first respondent, since it is an undisputed fact that Mr.G.Venkatesh having been issued with F-card at Coimbaore division is entitled to practice anywhere in India. Paragraph No.6 of the impugned communication, which restricts his practice to Coimbatore alone, has been issued without any authority under law, and therefore the said restriction found in paragraph No.6 of the impugned communication is set aside by this Court. Apart from the same, other deficiencies pointed out by the first respondent in the impugned communication remain unaltered, and the petitioner has also given an undertaking to comply with other deficiencies.
