I. Arul v. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul
Case brief
What is this about?
Santhanam v. State of Tamil Nadu (Superintendent of Police, Karur District; Inspector of Police, Velliyanai PS) and Chinnaraj - Crl.OP.(MD)No.13620 of 2026, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 08.07.2026 by R.Vijayakumar, J.; petition under Section 528 BNSS Act seeking restraint on police harassment/enquiry over a civil dispute; Government Advocate reported complaint closed on 20.05.2026 and no further enquiry; petition closed (disposed) without further direction; no cases cited; no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
No express direction issued; the Court accepted the Government Advocate's submission that the complaint against the petitioner was closed on 20.05.2026 and that he would not be called for any enquiry, and accordingly closed the petition on that basis. ¶22