M.Sriramar Vs The Registrar

¶1

C.M.P(MD)No.3994 of 2026

¶2

C.M.P(MD)No.3994 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.23861 of 2026

¶3

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

¶4

O R D E R

¶5

[Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.]

¶6

This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 158 days in

¶7

filing the above writ appeal.

¶8

2.Heard Mr.R.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.P.T.Thiraviam, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2. Though the names of the respondents 3 to 5 have been printed in the cause-list, there is no appearance on behalf of them, either in person or through counsel.

¶9

3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, we inclined to allow the petition. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered.

¶10

4.Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are

¶11

otherwise in order and post the appeal “for admission” in the usual course.

¶12

[N.S.K., J.] [M.J.R., J.] 30.04.2026

¶13

ps

¶14

1/2

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.M.P(MD)No.3994 of 2026

¶17

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

¶18

ps

¶19

C.M.P(MD)No.3994 of 2026 in W.A(MD)SR.No.23861 of 2026

¶20

30.04.2026

¶21

2/2

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.Sriramar v. The Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Sriramar v. The Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Administrator Vs Gurunathan

J.Arul Prakash, Vs Rajeshwari

M.Vijayaragavan Vs Ranjeet Singh IAS

M.Kadar Ibrahim Vs The State of Tamilnadu

The Administrator, Vs N. Dhashnaoorthy

Chellammal Vs Smfg India Credit Company Ltd.