The court condoned a 9-day delay in filing the writ appeal, finding the reasons sufficient and noting no objection from respondents. The appeal was directed to be numbered and posted for admission.
Delay of 9 days condoned; appeal to be numbered and posted for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P(MD)No.17876 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.86961 of 2024
C.M.P(MD)No.17876 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.86961 of 2024
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.]
This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 9 days in filing the above writ appeal.
2.Heard Mr.P.Mahendran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.C.Jeganathan, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and Mr.S.P.Maharajan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 and 3.
3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, and considering the fact that the respondents have no objection to the condonation of delay, we are inclined to allow the petition. Accordingly, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered.
4.Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise in order and post the appeal “ for admission” on 30.04.2026 .
ps
1/2
C.M.P(MD)No.17876 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.86961 of 2024
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. and M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
ps
C.M.P(MD)No.17876 of 2024 in W.A(MD)SR.No.86961 of 2024
29.04.2026
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 9 days in filing the writ appeal should be condoned?
N.SATHISH KUMAR
First Respondent
Respondents 2 and 3
N.SATHISH KUMAR
M.JOTHIRAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
