Allowed¶39

Sandeep Murali and Another v. No Respondent

Civil Practice and Procedure – Interlocutory application – Production of additional documents

Madras HC8 Jan 2026A/6154/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court short order dated 08-01-2026 by Justice P. Dhanabal; A.No.6154 of 2025 in OP No.108 of 2025; applicants Sandeep Murali and Uma Ram; counsel Mr.Hareesh K.M. for M/s.PV Law Associates; additional evidence; leave to produce documents belatedly; documents obtained after filing main petition; received subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility; admissibility cannot be tested through application; no respondent; evidence not recorded so far.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to produce the additional documents listed in the schedule, to be received in OP No.108 of 2025 subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility. ¶39

Sandeep Murali and Another Vs No Respondent — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

A.No.6154 of 2025 in OP. No.108 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 08-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

A No. 6154 of 2025 IN

¶7

OP No. 108 of 2025

¶8

Sandeep Murali and Another S/o.Late N.S.Murali, New No.10, Old No.22, Third Street, Royapettah High Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. and another

¶9

2. Uma Ram

¶10

W/o.Ram Rajagopalan, No.3/1, Second Street, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

¶11

Applicant(s)

¶12

¶13

No Respondent Nil

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

OP No. 108 of 2025

¶16

Sandeep Murali and Another S/o.Late N.S.Murali, New No.10, Old No.22, Third Street, Royapettah High Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

¶17

2.Uma Ram

¶18

W/o.Ram Rajagopalan, No.3/1, Second Street, Dr.Radhakrishnan Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004.

¶19

1/4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

A.No.6154 of 2025 in OP. No.108 of 2025

¶22

Petitioner(s)

¶23

¶24

No Respondent Nil

¶25

Respondent(s)

¶26

For Applicant : Mr.Hareesh K.M. for M/s.PV Law Associates

¶27

ORDER

¶28

This application has been filed by the applicant to receive additional

¶29

documents set out in the schedule to the petition as additional evidence in OP No.108 of 2025.

¶30

According to the applicant, he is the petitioner in the main petition and at the time of filing the petition, the mentioned documents are not available with him

¶31

and thereafter, obtained the documents recently. Therefore, filed this application.

¶32

In this case, there is no respondent.

¶33

Considering the nature of application and the evidence has not been

¶34

recorded so far, this application is filed to include the documents. As far as the admissibility, relevancy and proof, it cannot be tested through this application. This

¶35

2/4

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

A.No.6154 of 2025 in OP. No.108 of 2025

¶38

application is filed only to grant leave for production of documents belatedly.

¶39

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit and facts and circumstances of the case, in order to give a chance to the applicant, therefore, this petition is allowed and the documents can be received subject to proof, relevancy and admissibility.

08.01.2026

mtl

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

A.No.6154 of 2025 in OP. No.108 of 2025

¶45

P.DHANABAL, J.