Disposed¶31

K. Raja v. The District Collector

Writ of Mandamus – patta application

Madras HC25 Feb 2025WP(MD)/5025/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mandamus; patta; temple property; Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple; Muthooranpatti/Malayagoundanpatti Village; Nilakottai Taluk; Dindigul District; Tahsildar; electricity service connection; representation dated 23.01.2025; direction to decide on merits within four weeks; W.P.(MD)No.5025 of 2025; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; P.B. Balaji, J.; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 3rd respondent (Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk) to pass orders on the petitioner's patta application dated 23.01.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within four weeks; writ petition disposed of with no costs. ¶31

K. Raja Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD)No.5025 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 25.02.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI

¶6

W.P.(MD).No.5025 of 2025

¶7

K.Raja ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1. The District Collector, Collectorate Buildings, Dindigul District.

¶10

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District.

¶11

The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶12

The Village Administrative Officer, Maalaiyagoundanpatti Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 3^rd respondent to issue Patta in the name of the Arulmigu Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple in respect of the property comprised in S.No.176/1, to an extent of 29 cents situated at No.8-281-1, Malayagoundanpatti Village, Nilakottai

¶14

1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.(MD)No.5025 of 2025

¶16

Taluk, Dindigul District by considering the petitioners representation dated 23.01.2025.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.S.Kameshwaran Government Advocate

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Mr.S.Kameshwaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice on

¶20

behalf of the respondents.

¶21

The petitioner seeks limited relief of issuance of mandamus to direct the 3^rd respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner temple.

¶22

Considering the limited scope of prayer sought for in the writ petition, with the consent of the learned counsel on either side, writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

¶23

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has made an application for issuance of patta on 23.01.2025 and the same is pending without any progress.

¶24

2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.(MD)No.5025 of 2025

¶26

The petitioner in the process of restoring, renovating the heritage of A/m. Meenakshi Sundareshwarar Temple at Muthooranpatti Village, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District has approached the electricity authorities for service connection to be provided to the temple and since the authorities have instructed the petitioner to obtain patta in the name of the temple to enable them to provide electricity service connection. The petitioner has given a representation to the respondents on 14.01.2025 and thereafter on 23.01.2025.

¶27

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on records.

¶28

Considering the limited scope of relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the 3^rd respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's application dated 23.01.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today.

¶29

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.(MD)No.5025 of 2025

¶31