Allowed

Ganesan v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC12 Dec 2025WP(MD)/35674/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, Madurai Bench issued a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar and Surveyor, Tenkasi District, to survey and demarcate the petitioner's land aid of the Police Inspector within a time frame prescribed under Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondents to survey and demarcate the property in Survey No. 61/39 within twelve weeks under Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923.

Ganesan Vs The Tahsildar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.12.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

Ganesan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶11

2.The Surveyor, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶12

3.The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to survey and demarcate the property in Survey No.61/39 measuring Hectare 0-3.50 situated in Kilankadu Village, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District with the aid of the third respondent, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick

¶15

Page No. 1 of 5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

¶18

For R1 & R2 : Mr.D.Sadiq Raja Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶19

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first and second respondents, with the aid of the third respondent, to survey and demarcate the property in Survey No. 61/39, measuring 0.3.50 hectares, situated in Kilankadu Village, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District, within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶22

With the consent of the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner gave a representation dated 08.09.2025 for the demarcation of the boundaries of the property in question in the Grievance Redressal Camp, in person, on receipt of which Grievance ID No.

¶24

Page No. 2 of 5

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

¶27

TN/REV/TKS/P/COLLMGDP/08SEP25/15043170 dated 08.09.2025 was

¶28

generated, and thereafter the petitioner paid the prescribed fee on 30.09.2025 for the demarcation of the boundaries of the property. However, no action has been taken to demarcate the boundaries of the property.

¶29

The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first and second respondents would submit that, after consideration of the claims of both parties, proper steps would be taken to demarcate the land in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923.

¶30

Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Court directs the first and second respondents to consider the application of the petitioner, and to demarcate the petitioner’s land after consideration of the claims of all parties and to pass orders in accordance with Sections 9 and 10 of the Tamil Nadu Land Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In the event of any rival claims, the parties are at liberty to pursue their remedies before the Civil Court.

¶31

Page No. 3 of 5

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

¶34

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶35

There shall be no order as to costs.

[K.SURENDER, J.]

12.12.2025

JEN

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order

¶40

¶41

1.The Tahsildar, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶42

2.The Surveyor, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.

¶43

3.The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station, Tenkasi District.

¶44

Page No. 4 of 5

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

¶47

K.SURENDER, J.

¶48

JEN

¶49

W.P.(MD) No.35674 of 2025

¶50

12.12.2025

¶51

____________ Page No. 5 of 5_

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ganesan v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesan v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Malaichamy Vs The District Collector

Alangaram Vs The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar

N.Chinnappa Vs The District Collector

Selvanayagi Vs The Land Acquisition Officer and Special District Revenue Officer

Velukan.S Vs The District Collector

Ramesh P Vs The Tahsildar