Disposed¶18

Dharmaraj v. The District Revenue Officer

Writ of Mandamus (Article 226) – implementation of revenue order

Madras HC28 Nov 2025WP(MD)/34465/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P(MD)No.34465 of 2025; Dharmaraj v. The District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi & The Tahsildar, V.K Pudhur Taluk; Madras High Court (Madurai Bench); Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.; decided 28.11.2025; Article 226 Constitution of India; mandamus; patta issuance; reclassification; 'A' register mutation; Achankuttam Village; S.No.197/2B; 0.02.20 Ares (5.5 Cents); Ni.Mu. COLR/8350/2022-l1 dated 25.12.2023; direction to issue patta within two months; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Tahsildar, V.K Pudhur Taluk directed to issue patta to the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order; no costs awarded. ¶18

Dharmaraj Vs The District Revenue Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED : 28.11.2025

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

W.P(MD)No.34465 of 2025

Dharmaraj

... Petitioner

The District Revenue Officer, Tenkasi, Tenkasi District.

¶10

The Tahsildar, O/o the Tahsildar, V.K Pudhur Taluk, V.K Pudhur, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the 2nd respondent to implement the order of the 1st respondent in Ni.Mu. COLR/8350/2022-l1 dated 25.12.2023 and consequently directing the 2nd respondent to issue patta in the name of petitioner in respect of the land comprised in S.No.197/2B measuring an extent of 0.02.20 Ares (5.5 Cents) situated at Achankuttam Village, Veerakeralam Pudur, Tenkasi District within the time.

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.A.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

ORDER

¶16

An order dated 25.12.2023 was issued by the District Revenue Officer directing reclassification and issuance of patta to the petitioner. The petitioner seeks the implementation thereof.

¶17

Learned Government Advocate accepts notice for both the respondents. On the basis of written instructions, he submits that the “A” register has been mutated in accordance with the directions issued by the District Revenue Officer and that the patta would be issued within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

Recording the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the Tahsildar to issue the patta within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶19

28.11.2025

¶20

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RJR

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

¶24