Writ petition seeking quashing of insurance claim denial and direction to disburse amount was dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.29804 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.10.2025
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
W.P.(MD).No.29804 of 2025 and
W.M.P(MD)No.23053 of 2025
B.Seethalakshmi ... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned communication of the 2nd respondent in Claim No.580000/48/2025/00053125 dated 12.03.2025 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to disburse the claim amount to the petitioner.
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.29804 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Rishikesh For R1 : Mr.C.Karthik
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
25.10.2025
NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No rgm
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.29804 of 2025
To
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.29804 of 2025
P.T.ASHA, J.
rgm
W.P.(MD).No.29804 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.23053 of 2025
25.10.2025
4/4
B. Seethalakshmi
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd
The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Rajapalayam Branch
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
