Writ petition seeking direction to fix government guideline value for land in S.F.No.355, Oddanchathiram, on an unconsidered representation dated 08.08.2025. Court directed third respondent to dispose of the representation after enquiry and hearing within six weeks, without expressing opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD) No.29267 of 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.(MD)No.29267 of 2025
Mary
... Petitioner
Vs.
Dindigul.
Palani,
Dindigul District.
Sub Registrar Office, Oddanchathiram,
No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai.
W.P.(MD) No.29267 of 2025
5.The Assistant Commissioner,
HR & CE Department, Dindigul, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2025 and consequently direct the third respondent to fix the Government guideline value in S.F.No.355 at Oddanchathiram, Dindigul District.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sades Kumar For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader For Respondents 4 & 5 : Mr.P.Subbaraj Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2025 and for a consequential direction to the third respondent to fix the Government guideline value for S.F.No.355 at Oddanchathiram, Dindigul District.
2/6
W.P.(MD) No.29267 of 2025
2 . The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has sent a representation to the respondents on 08.08.2025, seeking to fix the guideline value for the subject property. Since the said representation remains unconsidered till date, the petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.
3 . Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner would be considered by the official respondents in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
4 . Accordingly, this Court directs the third respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 08.08.2025, by fixing the guideline value for the land in S.F.No.355, after conducting an enquiry in accordance with law and after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned and also taking into consideration the orders passed for the petitioner's co-owners, within a period of six [6] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
3/6
W.P.(MD) No.29267 of 2025
5 . With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
04.12.2025
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No MR
4/6
W.P.(MD) No.29267 of 2025
Dindigul District.
HR & CE Department,
No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai.
HR & CE Department, Dindigul,
Dindigul District.
5/6
W.P.(MD) No.29267 of 2025
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
MR
W.P.(MD)No.29267 of 2025
04.12.2025
6/6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Sub Registrar should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation seeking fixation of guideline value for S.F.No.355 at Oddanchathiram.
Mary
The District Collector, Dindigul District
The District Registrar, Palani Registration District
The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Oddanchathiram
The Commissioner, HR & CE Department
The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
