Disposed

V.Arockayee v. The District Collector

Madras HC4 Jun 2025WP(MD)/13810/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petitioner sought mandamus to complete an enquiry into alleged violation of assignment conditions by a assignee who sold assigned land. The court, without examining merits, directed the District Revenue Officer to conclude the enquiry and pass final orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to second respondent to complete enquiry in O.Mu.A3/945/2025 dated 21.02.2025 and pass final orders on merits within twelve weeks; no costs.

V.Arockayee Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.13810 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 04.06.2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

Writ Petition(MD)No.13810 of 2025

V.Arockayee

..Petitioner

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Sivagangai.

¶11

2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai.

¶12

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai.

¶13

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ilaiyangudi, Sivagangai District.

¶14

5.N.Nagasamy Thevar

¶15

6.Tamilarasan

¶16

..Respondents

¶17

1/5

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

W.P(MD)No.13810 of 2025

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to complete the enquiry proceedings in O.Mu.A3/945/2025 dated 21.02.2025 on the basis of the representation of the petitioner dated 05.02.2025.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil

¶22

For Respondents : Ms.K.Malathi Addl. Govt. Pleader (RR1 to 4)

¶23

ORDER

¶24

This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the second respondent to complete the enquiry in his proceedings in O.Mu.A3/945/2025 dated 21.02.2025 on the basis of the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 05.02.2025.

¶25

Heard the arguments of Mr.D.Senthil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.K.Malathi, learned Additional Government Pleader, who took notice for the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse order is going to be passed, notice to the respondents 5 and 6 is dispensed with. By consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P(MD)No.13810 of 2025

¶29

It is the case of the petitioner that the fifth respondent was assigned with the land measuring an extent of 2.02.5 Hectares situated at S.No.162/3 in

¶30

Melathuraiyur Village, Kannamangalam Post, Ilaiyangudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. The assignment was made for the purpose of agricultural cultivation. Violating the conditions, the fifth respondent sold the same to the 6^th respondent and the patta has also been transferred to the 6^th respondent. The petitioner therefore submitted a representation before the second respondent on 05.02.2025 seeking to cancel the assignment in favour of the 5^th respondent and to cancel the patta granted in favour of the 6^th respondent. As the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has come forward before this Court.

¶31

Ms.K.Malathi, learned Additional Government Pleader, who took notice for the respondents 1 to 4, would submit that already the second respondent sought a report from the third respondent and final order will be passed by the second respondent, after receipt of the report from the third respondent.

¶32

In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4, without going into the merits of

¶33

3/5

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P(MD)No.13810 of 2025

¶36

the matter, the second respondent is directed to complete the enquiry initiated by his proceedings in O.Mu.A3/945/2025 dated 21.02.2025 and pass final orders on its own merits within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶37

With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No

¶38

costs.

¶39

04.06.2025

¶40

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes skn To

¶41

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Sivagangai.

¶42

2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai.

¶43

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sivagangai.

¶44

4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ilaiyangudi, Sivagangai District.

¶45

4/5

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

W.P(MD)No.13810 of 2025

¶48

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

¶49

skn

¶50

Writ Petition(MD)No.13810 of 2025

¶51

04.06.2025

¶52

5/5

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

V.Arockayee v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Arockayee v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jenifer Vs The District Collector

Urmila Bhuvanesh Vs The Principal District Judge

Margaret Jebaraj Vs The District Collector

Dhanalakshmi Vs The District Collector

Lakshmanan Vs The District Collector

Noorol Ameen Sh Vs The District Revenue Officer