Dismissed¶25

M.Ayyakani v. The Thasildhar

Madras HC12 Sept 2025WP/8053/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; WP No. 8053 of 2019; petitioner M. Ayyakani; respondents include Thasildhar Cuddalore and Joint Sub Registrar-II Cuddalore; prayer under Article 226 Constitution of India for certiorarified mandamus against rejection order/check slip dated 26-12-2018 and for registration of document dated 22-11-2018; R3-R7 impleaded 14/06/2019 via WMP.No.15391/19; petitioner absent on 08.09.2025, 10.09.2025, 12.09.2025; dismissed without adjudication, no costs; no cases cited, no monetary relief.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, the petitioner having been unrepresented on 08.09.2025, 10.09.2025 and 12.09.2025; no substantive issue was adjudicated. ¶25

M.Ayyakani Vs The Thasildhar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 8053 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-09-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

WP No. 8053 of 2019

M.Ayyakani

Petitioner(s)

The Thasildhar Cuddalore, cuddalore district

¶11

2.The Joint sub Registrar- II Cuddalore Cuddalore District

¶12

3.Ambika W/o.kuppuraj

¶13

4.Sakthivel S/o.kuppuraj

¶14

5.Hemalatha, D/o.kuppuraj

¶15

6.Nagalakshmi D/o.kasinathan,

¶16

7.Shanthawathy W/o.kasinathan, R6 And R7 Are Residing At No.86, Kasukadi Street, Cuddalore Port, O.t.cuddalore, Cuddalore Dt. (R3 To R7 Are Impleaded Vide Order

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 8053 of 2019

¶19

Dt 14/06/2019 Made In Wmp.no.15391/19 In Wp.no.8053/19 By Pdaj)

¶20

Respondent(s)

¶21

PRAYER: This petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned rejection order (Check slip) dated 26-12-2018 by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd Respondents to Register the petitones document dated 22-11-2018.

¶22

For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Gnadhi Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.Stalin Abimanyu AGP For R1 And R2 R3 To R7 - NRN

¶23

ORDER

¶24

When the Matter was listed for hearing on 08.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence the matter was posted on 10.09.2025. When the matter was taken for hearing on 10.09.2025, the petitioner was absent and posted the matter on 12.09.2025 under the caption for dismissal. Today, the case is listed for hearing under the caption “for dismissal” but today also none represented on behalf of the petitioner.

¶25