Dismissed¶24

N.Subramanian v. The Sub Registrar

Madras HC12 Sept 2025WP/21471/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal as infructuous on counsel's endorsement; no merits decided. Keywords: writ of certiorarified mandamus; Article 226; refusal/pending registration of document No.176/2017; sale certificate issued by Debt Recovery Tribunal II Chennai; Sub Registrar Thiruvotriyur; District Registrar (Admn.) Chennai North; letter No.12296/A1/2018 dated 06.08.2018; efflux of time; endorsement; WMP No. 20672 of 2019 closed; Madras High Court; M. Dhandapani J.; 12-09-2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of the learned counsel for the petitioner's submission and endorsement that the relief sought had become infructuous by efflux of time, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition (WMP No. 20672 of 2019) is closed. ¶24

N.Subramanian Vs The Sub Registrar — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

WP No. 21471 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12-09-2025

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

WP No. 21471 of 2019 AND

¶7

WMP NO. 20672 OF 2019

¶8

N.Subramanian

¶9

S/o.Narayanaswamy, No.42, Sourastra Nagar, 9th Street, Choolaimedu, Chennai 600 094.

¶10

Petitioner(s)

¶11

¶12

The Sub Registrar, Thiruvotriyur, Chennai 19.

¶13

2.The District Registrar (Admn.), District Registrar Office, Chennai North, Chennai 600 001.

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents ending with order of the 2nd respondent in his letter No.12296/ A1/ 2018 dated 06.08.2018, quash the same and direct the respondents to register the pending document No.176/2017 (the sale certificate issued by the Debt Recovery Tribunal II Chennai) on the file of the 1st respondent.

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No. 21471 of 2019

¶19

For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Selvaraju

¶20

For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2

¶21

ORDER

¶22

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, by efflux of time, the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶23