Mrs.Kothai v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC10 Sept 2025WP/2603/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; W.P No.2603 of 2018; Kothai vs Government of Tamil Nadu and others; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on 10.09.2025; Article 226 certiorarified mandamus; impugned communication N.K.No.5401/B1/2017 dated 06.10.2017 of District Registrar (Admin) Cuddalore; cancellation of sale deeds (document Nos.1635/2014 to 2058/2015) sought before Joint II Sub Registrar Tirupapuliyur; respondents 6-24 impleaded 20.03.2018 in WMP No.4788 of 2018; withdrawal endorsed by counsel; no merits decided; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, and the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. ¶30-31

Mrs.Kothai Vs Government of Tamil Nadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

W.P No.2603 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.09.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

W.P No.2603 of 2018

Kothai

..... Petitioner

1.Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government Commercial Tax and Registration Department Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Inspector General of Registration Santhome High Road Mylapore, Chennai-4. 3. The District Registrar (Admin) Cuddalore. 4.The Joint II Sub Registrar Tirupapuliyur Cuddalore District. 5.M.Venkatesan 6.S.Noorjahan 7.P.Jothi 8.K.Lakshmi 9.R.Sujatha 10.S.Punitha 11.Abdul Kareemkhan 12.H.Senthil 13.H.Katheeja Begum 14.K.Mohamed Shajahan 15.K.Sri Ambiga 16.C.Pradeepa 17.A.Tamilvanan 18.P.Kannagi

¶11

Page 1 of 4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.P No.2603 of 2018

¶14

19.S.Revathi

¶15

20.N.Elampuranan 21.S.Srinivas Pillai 22.K.Ravi 23.T.Parimala

¶16

24.A.Arunachalam (R6 to R24 were impleaded as per order dated 20.03.2018 made in WMP No.4788 of 2018) ..... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned communication in N.K.No.5401/B1/2017 dated 06.10.2017 on the file of the 3rd respondent and quash the same; consequently direct the respondents 3 & 4 to cancel the sale deeds in document Nos.1635/2014, 1636/2014, 1637/2014, 1638/2014, 1715/2014, 1716/2014, 1717/2014, 1718/2014, 1719/2014, 1895/2014, 1896/2014, 2047/2014, 2267/2014, 2860/2014, 2979/2014, 2980/2014, 3558/2014, 3858/2014, 305/2015 and 2058/2015 on the file of the 4th respondent with immediate effect and further direct the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry in this regard and to take necessary action in accordance with law within a reasonable period to be fixed by this Court.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.Mohamed Dharwish

¶19

for M/s.D.Rajasekar

¶20

For R1 to R4 : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai Government Advocate

¶21

RR6,7, 9 & 16-Not ready in notice No appearance- R8, 10 to 15, 17 to 24

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

Page 2 of 4