Disposed¶23

Ravichandran v. Poongodi

Madras HC20 Jan 2025SA(MD)/1210/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second Appeal disposed on compromise; Madras High Court Madurai Bench; V.Sivagnanam J.; S.A.(MD)No.1210 of 2005; C.M.P.(MD)No.8223 of 2005 closed; Section 100 Civil Procedure Code; appeal against II Additional Sub Court Tiruchirapalli A.S.No.97 of 2004 (14.02.2005) which reversed District Munsif Court Turaiyur O.S.No.3 of 1997 (31.03.2004); parties Ravichandran and Poongodi; compromise memo part and parcel of appeal; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal disposed of in accordance with the compromise arrived at between the parties; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed. ¶23

Ravichandran Vs Poongodi — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.(MD)No.1210 of 2005

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 20.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

S.A.(MD)No.1210 of 2005 and C.M.P.(MD)No.8223 of 2005

¶7

Ravichandran

¶8

...Defendant/Respondent/Appellant

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

Poongodi

¶11

...Plaintiff/Appellant/Respondent

¶12

Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Decree and Judgment of the II Additional Sub Court, Tiruchirapalli in A.S.No.97 of 2004, dated 14.02.2005, reversing the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.3 of 1997, dated 31.03.2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Turaiyur.

¶13

For Appellant : Mr.M.Pozhilan

For Respondent

: Mr.R.Manoharan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Page 1 of 4

¶19

S.A.(MD)No.1210 of 2005

¶20

JUDGMENT

¶21

This Second Appeal has been filed against the Decree and Judgment of the II Additional Sub Court, Tiruchirapalli in A.S.No.97 of 2004, dated 14.02.2005, reversing the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.3 of 1997, dated 31.03.2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Turaiyur.

¶22

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the compromise has arrived between the parties. The parties were also present before this Court and agreed to the terms of compromise.

¶23

3.The compromise memo becomes part and parcel of the Second Appeal. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is disposed of in accordance with the compromise arrived at between the parties. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶24

20.01.2025

¶25

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Page 2 of 4

¶28

S.A.(MD)No.1210 of 2005

¶29

¶30