Dismissed¶¶30

S.Ganesan v. P.G.Pichai @ Krishnan

Madras HC10 Jan 2025SA/794/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.A.No.794 of 2004, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 10.01.2025 by V. Sivagnanam J. Second appeal under Section 100 CPC against A.S.No.255 of 2001 (Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai, judgment dated 04.09.2002) reversing O.S.No.71 of 2001 (District Munsif, Madurai Taluk, decree dated 09.10.2001). Dismissed for default for non-appearance of appellants (S. Ganesan and others); no costs; connected C.M.P.No.6149 of 2004 closed. Respondents: P.G. Pitchai @ Krishnan and others, represented by D. Sathiyarsi. No issues decided, no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation for the appellants when the matter came up for hearing, the second appeal is dismissed for default, with no costs. ¶¶30

S.Ganesan Vs P.G.Pichai @ Krishnan — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.794 of 2004

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

S.A.No.794 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.6149 of 2004

¶7

1.S.Ganesan

¶8

2.S.M.S.Balasubramanian Chettiar

¶9

3.S.M.S.Krishnan Chettiar

¶10

4.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Chettiar

¶11

5.M.S.Chandrasekaran Chettiar

¶12

6.S.Balakrishnan Chettiar

¶13

7.B.Balu @ Balamurugan

¶14

...Plaintiffs 1 to 6 & 8/Respondents 1 to 6 & 8/

¶15

Appellants

¶16

-Vs-

¶17

1.P.G.Pitchai @ Krishnan

2.P.G.Ramakrishnan

3.P.G.Vijayarajan

4.P.G.Archunan

5.P.S.Pichaimani ...Defendants/Appellants/Respondents

¶22

Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.09.2002 passed in A.S.No.255 of 2001 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge's Court, Madurai reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 09.10.2001, passed in O.S.No.71 of 2001 on the file of District Munsif's Court, Madurai Taluk.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Page 1 of 3

¶25

S.A.No.794 of 2004

¶26

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : M/s.D.Sathiyarsi

¶27

¶28

JUDGMENT

¶29

This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 04.09.2002 passed in A.S.No.255 of 2001 on the file of Principal Subordinate Judge's Court, Madurai reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 09.10.2001 passed in O.S.No.71 of 2001 on the file of District Munsif Court, Madurai Taluk.

¶30

2.When the matter came up for hearing today, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶31

10.01.2025

¶32

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

Page 2 of 3

¶35

S.A.No.794 of 2004

¶36

V.SIVAGNANAM. J,