Dismissed¶28

Abubakar v. v.Ponnusamy,S/O.Vairamuthu

Madras HC10 Jan 2025SA/1058/2004

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

S.A.No.1058 of 2004, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, decided 10.01.2025 by V.Sivagnanam J. Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed for default due to repeated non-appearance of appellants (absent for the third time); no appearance for respondents either. Challenge to A.S.No.20 of 2002 (Principal Subordinate Judge, Thenkasi, decree dated 31.10.2002) reversing O.S.No.211 of 1996 (Principal District Munsiff, Thenkasi, decree dated 01.11.2001). Parties: Abubakar, Abdul Rahim, Velsamy, Zulaikha Beevi, Aneesh Mohammed, Gadhimathiammal (appellants) versus V.Ponnusamy (Respondent-1) and Ummugulthul Beevi, Paramasivan Mudaliar, P.M.Abdul Lattiff (ex-parte respondents). No costs. No merits or legal issues decided; no precedents cited.

What the court decided

Abubakar Vs v.Ponnusamy,S/O.Vairamuthu — Madras HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.1058 of 2004

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 10.01.2025

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

S.A.No.1058 of 2004

¶7

1.Abubakar

¶8

2.Abdul Rahim

¶9

3.Velsamy

¶10

4.Zulaikha Beevi

¶11

5.Aneesh Mohammed

¶12

6.Gadhimathiammal ...Plaintiffs 1,6,4,7,8,9/Respondents 1,3,4,7,8,9/ Appellants

¶13

-Vs-

¶14

1.V.Ponnusamy

¶15

...Defendant/Appellant/Respondent-1

¶16

2.Ummugulthul Beevi

¶17

3.Paramasivan Mudaliar 4.P.M.Abdul Lattiff ...Plaintiffs 2,5,3/Respondents 2,5,6

¶18

(remained ex-parte)/Respondents 2 to 4

¶19

Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2002 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thenkasi in A.S.No.20 of 2002 reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 01.11.2001 passed by Principal District Munsiff, Thenkasi in O.S.No.211 of 1996 praying to allow the second appeal and to set aside the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2002 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Thenkasi.

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Page 1 of 3

¶22

S.A.No.1058 of 2004

¶23

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

¶24

¶25

JUDGMENT

¶26

This Second Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 31.10.2002 passed by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thenkasi in A.S.No.20 of 2002 reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 01.11.2001 passed by Principal District Munsiff, Thenkasi in O.S.No.211 of 1996 praying to allow the second appeal and to set aside the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2002 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Thenkasi.

¶27

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, there is no representation on the side of the appellants. The appellant remained absent for the third time.

¶28

3.In view of the above, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default.

¶29

No costs.

¶30

10.01.2025

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Page 2 of 3