D.Rajagopal v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Bail granted – Penetrative sexual assault (Sections 5(1) r/w 6, POCSO Act, 2012)
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court (Madurai Bench), Criminal Original Petition CRL OP(MD) No.1710 of 2025, decided 29/01/2025 by N. Anand Venkatesh J. Keywords: bail; Sec.483 BNSS; POCSO Act 2012 Sections 5(1) read with 6; penetrative sexual assault; juvenile/adolescent accused aged 19; Crime No.94 of 2024 Puluthipatti Police Station Sivagangai; victim statement Section 183 BNSS; love affair and elopement to Palani; incarceration since 20.12.2024; bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties; conditions on reporting, no tampering, no absconding; breach action per P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala (2005) AIR SCW 5560; fresh FIR under Section 269 BNS 2023 on absconding.
What did the court decide?
Release on bail on executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under the POCSO Act, Sivagangai District, subject to conditions: (a) sureties to affix photographs and left thumb impression with Aadhar card/Bank pass book verification; (b) petitioner to report before respondent Police as and when required for interrogation; (c) petitioner not to tamper with evidence or witness during investigation or trial; (d) petitioner not to abscond during investigation or trial; (e) on breach, the Magistrate/Trial Court entitled to take appropriate action as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; (f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023.