Allowed

Ijaz Ahammed v. The state of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC29 Jan 2025CRL MP(MD)/1135/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of a condition imposed in an earlier anticipatory/bail order requiring him to report to police. Court noted compliance for about 31 weeks, relaxed the condition, and directed appearance only when required.

What did the court decide?

Condition of regular appearance in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6904 of 2024 dated 08.05.2024 relaxed; petitioner to appear as and when required.

Ijaz Ahammed Vs The state of Tamil Nadu — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2025)

¶1

CRL.MP(MD). No.1135 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 29.01.2025

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

CRL.MP(MD). No.1135 of 2025 in CRL.OP(MD). No.6904 of 2024 Ijaz Ahammed ... Petitioner / Petitioner / Accused No.1 Vs.

¶7

The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Elayangudi Police Station, Sivagangai District. (Crime No.102 of 2024) ... Respondent / Respondent / Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD). No.6904 of 2024 dated 08.05.2024 and thus render justice.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jainul Abudheen For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶10

1/3

¶11

CRL.MP(MD). No.1135 of 2025

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This petition has been filed for relaxation of the condition imposed on the petitioner in the order dated 08.05.2024 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6904 of 2024.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6904 of 2024 on 08.05.2024, regularly and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has complied the conditions nearly 31 weeks.

¶16

Taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6904 of 2024 on 08.05.2024 is relaxed and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required.

Sd/-

29.01.2025

// True Copy //

30/01 /2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis pal

¶22

2/3

¶23

CRL.MP(MD). No.1135 of 2025

¶24

To:

¶25

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ELAYANGUDI.

¶26

1. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶27

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ELAYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶28

1. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

COPY TO:

¶30

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBCID, SIVAGANGAI

¶31

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.1135 of 2025 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6904 of 2024 Date :29/01/2025

¶32

ES/SA/SAR /30.01.2025/ 3P/6C

¶33

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/3

Ijaz Ahammed v. The state of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ijaz Ahammed v. The state of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmanan, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Sivaperumal Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Murugan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Vijayakumar, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Vijay Gobal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

D.Rajagopal Vs The State of Tamil Nadu