Murugan Vs The State of Tamilnadu

The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police, Panagudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.95 of 2025) ... Respondent / Complainant

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Susikumar, Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.Thanga Aravind.B, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS Act.

¶14

PRAYER :-

¶15

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.95 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police

¶17

for the alleged offences under Sections 303(2) of BNS r/w. Section 21(1) of Mines https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

1/5

¶19

CRL OP(MD). No.1586 of 2025

¶20

and Minerals (Development Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No. 95 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶21

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 6 units of M-sand and 6 units of red sand in lorry. Hence, the case.

¶22

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material records of the case.

¶23

The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Saide), on instructions, submitted that there are totally 4 accused persons in this case and the petitioner has been arrayed as A4 and there are 2 previous cases against the petitioner and A1 and A3 were arrested in this case.

¶24

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the quantity of minerals involved, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

¶25

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Valliyoor, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

2/5

¶27

CRL OP(MD). No.1586 of 2025

¶28

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶29

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶30

[b] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) to the credit of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Advocate Clerk's Welfare Association, Madurai-625023 (Account No:- 496039124, IFSC Code:IDIB000H040), without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. Only upon deposit, the learned Magistrate shall accept the sureties;

¶31

[c] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶32

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶33

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶34

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the

¶35

learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

3/5

¶37

CRL OP(MD). No.1586 of 2025

¶38

in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶39

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under

¶40

Section 269 of BNS, 2023.